Re: [fw-mvc] so complex!

Thanks all you guys, it takes long time to read this list of mails. But after that, i am sure that I choose the right framework, at least i can get lots of answers when i meet some problems.

When it comes to ZF, it is good enough too.I am not a stupid programmer, and i think i can learn to master it. Your sharing helps a lot.

2009/9/17 huajun qi <qihjun@gmail.com>

Good advice, I will try to use zf as comfortable as i can.

2009/9/16 Nikolaos Dimopoulos <nikos@niden.net>

<0.02>

ZF (or any framework) can be extremely intimidating even to competent programmers that English is not their native tongue. I have lived in English speaking countries for the best part of 15 years and still I cannot translate in my native language the difference between a decorator, a validator and other terms used in the framework. Don't even try to get me started on plugins :)

I believe that the best approach for a novice (which I am one) is to use ZF as a glue component. Don't try to dive into the MVC just yet. Code your application the way you usually do and glue ZF components to it. Once you are comfortable with those components your transition to the full MVC architecture will be much easier than any previous attempts.

Finally be curious and ask questions. By far the ZF lists are the most helpful that I have ever seen. There is no RTFM here and people are extremely helpful even if the question appears to be a dumb one or has been answered a million times.

</0.02>
Best regards

Nikolaos Dimopoulos

The contents of this message may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended solely for the recipient(s). Use or distribution to and by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:26, Duo Zheng <duozheng@gmail.com> wrote:

Especially the chapter about Zend_Test should be clearer, how to setup a
testing enviroment with Zend_Application.

I proposed the improvement a few days ago here: http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-7839

On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Andreas Kraftl wrote:

Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Matthew Weier
O'Phinney:

On that note, my team and I have begun an initiative to provide a more
tutorial oriented section to the manual.

I love this idea. But another idea is, to extend the manual with two
small things.

Every class where it make sense, should describe how to interact with
Zend_Application and how to initialize it in the bootstrap. Second is,
to describe some unittests.

Especially the chapter about Zend_Test should be clearer, how to setup a
testing enviroment with Zend_Application.

Or more better, Zend_Tool can do this.

The main problem this time is, that Zend_Application is a very good and
in the meantime a central point of the Framework. But the documentation
covers all before Zend Framework 1.8.

If i am right, I think the manual should be written more in the
direction Zend_Application.


Last point: whenever you say a programmer should know how to create
things ...
A programmer knows better, how to delete things than a not programmer
knows how to add things.

I am not sure, if Zend Framework would be a framework for week
programmers or beginners. But if so, then change direction of thought
how to write the manual.

Thanks and greetings
Andreas
--
Kraftl EDV - Dienstleistungen
Linux, Linuxschulungen, Webprogrammierung
Autofabrikstraße 16/6
1230 Wien

--
Location:

--
Location: