2009年11月1日星期日

Re: [fw-db] weird Zend_Db_Table_Abstract behaviour

Yes... I would have thought it...
I'll follow your suggestion to wrap the update in a try/catch statement.
Many thanks!!

prodigitalson wrote:
>
> The result is successful. Update returns the number of affected rows. IF
> there is nothing to update it will retun 0 which is going to eval to
> false. IF something goes wrong in the query its going to throw an
> exception, not return false.
>
> if you want to check that the qurey went through then wrap your update in
> a try catch and return false in the catch.
>
> If on the other hand you are expecting to at least have one row modified
> then you can test agianst > 0.
>
>
> nulele wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I don't know why, but when I call the method below and there's nothing to
>> update (datas are not changed) it returns false... I mean is this normal?
>> Even if datas are not changed I would expect a successful result of the
>> update operation... it simply would update nothing!!
>>
>> class Model_DbTable_Users extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
>> {
>> protected $_name = 'users';
>> protected $_primary = 'id_user';
>>
>> ....
>>
>> public function updateData($data, $id)
>> {
>> $id = (int)$id;
>> if($this->update($data, "id_user = " . $id))
>> {
>> return true;
>> }
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> }
>>
>> Maybe the problem could be NOT NULL fileds in the db?
>> I know, would be better to include the update code in a try/catch
>> statement, but I want to hear your opinion on this weird behaviour.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/weird-Zend_Db_Table_Abstract-behaviour-tp26136108p26154641.html
Sent from the Zend DB mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

没有评论: