(on Tuesday, 31 March 2009, 04:15 PM +1100):
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> <matthew@zend.com> wrote:
> > -- Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com> wrote
> > Could it be made simpler? Yes, very likely. Would it lose flexibility
> > in doing so? Yes, very likely.
>
> This wasn't a call to remove some functionality from ZF.
>
> > One of the guiding principles of ZF since the beginning is to provide
> > flexible and extensible solutions so that ZF users can adapt the
> > framework to their needs -- and not the other way around. Most other
> > frameworks take the "convention over configuration" approach which,
>
> Yes, you are right flexibility is good thing I don't like frameworks
> which forced me to use specific naming conventions and tweak millions
> configuration options.
>
> > I have ideas for simplifying the call graph. But all of the ideas above
> > are quite important to the goals of the project.
>
> Could you share your ideas?
Some of them are on th ewiki (search for "Zend_Controller 2.0"). Others
are in development, and I'll be posting about them when they're a bit
more solid and I've had a chance to do some benchmarking and call
graphs.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | matthew@zend.com
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
没有评论:
发表评论