2009年9月17日星期四

Re: [fw-mvc] so complex!

It's a matter of flexibility/customisability vs automation in my opinion.

On one end if the spectrum are CRUD builders which offer very rapid
development, but which are much more difficult to customise and extend.

On the other end, I suppose, lives very abstract, basic plumbing
facilities. Easy to customize, but you're doing more work than you should
have to.

Having evaluated quite a few frameworks, I think the ZF has hit a real
sweet spot and my hat is off to all of the developers and contributors.

Nothing is perfect, but the ZF has made me a much more productive and
happy developer. At the end of the day that's all that matters to me. If
something better comes along, I'd surely like to know but from where I
stand right now I can't hardly imagine such a tool (at least in PHP land).

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Graham Anderson wrote:

> On Thursday 17 September 2009 13:35:22 aoohralex wrote:
>> huajun - Zend Framework is bad framework. It is too flexible, many strange
>> things You must make by myself - for example adds to bootstraps:
>
> I don't think I've read anything quite so ridiculous on this list in a while.
>
> In Symfony, you do things the Symfony way. In Prado, you do things the Prado
> way. In Zend Framework, you do things the Zend Framework way.
>
> *That's the bottom line.*
>
> --
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes."
> ☘ Oscar Wilde
>
>

没有评论: