(on Friday, 12 December 2008, 08:06 AM -0800):
>
> +1
>
> I think that it would add more flexibility, make things easier and also
> separate the view back out or zend_form.
Umm... it's already done -- it shipped in 1.6.0.
> Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
> >
> > A number of users have reported that they'd like syntax like the following
> > in Zend_Form:
> >
> > <table>
> > <tr>
> > <td><?= $this->form->foo->renderLabel() ?></td>
> > <td>
> > <?= $this->form->foo->renderElement() ?>
> > <?= $this->form->foo->renderDescription() ?>
> > <?= $this->form->foo->renderErrors() ?>
> > </td>
> > </tr>
> > </table>
> >
> > The idea is that they would like to selectively render specific metadata
> > from the element or form.
> >
> > This could be done fairly easily by using overloading. __call() could
> > intercept methods beginning in 'render', and if the remainder of the
> > method matches a decorator, would render that decorator.
> >
> > I've created an issue to track this, and you can view it at:
> >
> > http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-3217
> >
> > Please comment, if you are interested in the idea.
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> > Software Architect | matthew@zend.com
> > Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-rendering-enhancement-proposal-tp17103921p20978461.html
> Sent from the Zend MVC mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | matthew@zend.com
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
没有评论:
发表评论